Kosh's Shadow 11/21/2020 8:13:54 AM

1

I guess everyone slept late.

I took the dogs out around 8 (later than usual, but they didn't wake us up earlier), went back to bed.

Then, around 10, was awakened by a 24 lb dog jumping on the bed because she was ready to be up for the day.

I had just finished a very strange dream that I can't make much sense of, involving aliens, a luxury submarine, some way some people could run faster than a train, some gourmet food (some of it nonkosher, that I tried to avoid having), and other stuff.

(But would a gourmet chef really put truffle-infused lobster Newburgh studded with shrimp in aluminum foil? That is the treif food I didn't eat, btw.)

Occasional Reader 11/21/2020 8:55:17 AM

2

In #1 Kosh's Shadow said: But would a gourmet chef really put truffle-infused lobster Newburgh studded with shrimp in aluminum foil?

Sprinkle some shredded count chocula cereal on top, and you’ve got the next “foodie“ sensation.

Occasional Reader 11/21/2020 9:06:07 AM

3

So it seems that DeBlasio even managed to fuck up the Rockefeller Center Christmas tree:

https://www.steynonline.com/10761/the-decapitator-veto

Kosh's Shadow 11/21/2020 9:39:41 AM

4

Reply to Occasional Reader in 3:

Don't have time to watch the segment, but this text was interesting:

On Wednesday Steyn returned to the ratings phenomenon "Tucker Carlson Tonight" to discuss the "President-Elect"'s proposed head of the "US Agency for Global Media" - a man called Richard Stengel, who wants to amend the First Amendment because it "should not protect hateful speech that can cause violence by one group against another".

Why do I think that if they decide not to protect hateful speech, it will only apply to racist and anti-Muslim speech, and not, for example, hate towards Jews or Catholics?

Kosh's Shadow 11/21/2020 9:54:57 AM

5

Reply to Kosh's Shadow in 4:

Oh, and the concept will be supported by most Jewish organizations because they want to stop "hate speech", and don't realize that this can be used against them. Media and the global thought police won't do a thing about Islamic Jew-hatred, although they will clamp down on some Holocaust denial and right-wing Jew hatred. Farrakhan will continue to be able to call Jews "termites", and Islamic preachers will keep calling for exterminating Jews. But pointing out Islamic Jew hatred will be considered "Islamophobic" and stopped.

Occasional Reader 11/21/2020 9:59:15 AM

6

In #4 Kosh's Shadow said: Why do I think that if they decide not to protect hateful speech, it will only apply to racist and anti-Muslim speech, and not, for example, hate towards Jews or Catholics?

Because you’ve been paying attention for the last 20 years or so?

Occasional Reader 11/21/2020 10:10:17 AM

7

In #4 Kosh's Shadow said: Why do I think that if they decide not to protect hateful speech, it will only apply to racist and anti-Muslim speech

And of course, “anti-Muslim“ speech will include pointing out factual if inconvenient-to-the-narrative things about Islam.

Kosh's Shadow 11/21/2020 10:15:03 AM

8

In #7 Occasional Reader said: And of course, “anti-Muslim“ speech will include pointing out factual if inconvenient-to-the-narrative things about Islam.

Exactly. Pointing out the 9/11 hijackers were Muslim will not be allowed, but saying it was the Jooooos or an inside job will be allowed.

Kosh's Shadow 11/21/2020 2:46:47 PM

9

lucius septimius 11/21/2020 3:55:31 PM

10

Kosh's Shadow 11/21/2020 4:00:17 PM

11

Need a cartoon of the Uighurs being herded into concentration camps, with a picture of the UN in the background, with a sign "Never Again" ("Never" being crossed out as I did here)

And while Trump has the time, he should bring up a resolution condemning China, and tell the UN to support it, or leave.

Kosh's Shadow 11/21/2020 4:13:08 PM

12

In #11 Kosh's Shadow said: And while Trump has the time, he should bring up a resolution condemning China, and tell the UN to support it, or leave.

I suggest Wuhan as a new location. Right near the bio labs.